While writing this post Renato Brunetta is rising on his blue car in the direction of Fiuggi, where he will speak at the congress of CISL Civil Service. E 'except that there may be disputes (as opposed to what seems to have happened at the congress of doctors CISL: according to eyewitness accounts, when the Minister appointed his colleague Sacconi Government would save a lot of boos).
The question is, what it is willing to offer the CISL Brunetta to convince her to come within the ranks of the "Friends"? For now, it would seem little. Also because the CISL for now is asking a lot. The statements made in recent days by Secretary General Raffaele Bonanni are challenging the government's legislative decree is rejected almost in its entirety.
We now know for sure that the minister and his engineers are working on a series of corrections to be made to measure. Corrections requested by other ministers, but also by the Administration, or special areas of public administration. Let's see what it is.
Rule of 25-50-25. And 'perhaps the most important point of the decree. According to the text carried by Brunetta in the Council of Ministers, all the administrations from now on will have to deploy the additional payment according to a prefixed scheme: full premium to 25% of employees, our talented, award halved to 50%, normal, zero premium to 25%, the alleged slackers (I apologize for using this word, which I loathe). It 's a very rigid model, which many question, starting with the government that the premiums have already differentiated them to us: we have our own system that works well for years - they say - because it forces us to change?
Yesterday one of the technicians closest to Brunetta, economist Leonard Tronti, ha annunciato al Forum Pa che nel testo finale la norma sarà resa più flessibile. Sarà infatti prevista la possibilità di deroga: nelle singole amministrazioni si potrà concordare con il sindacato un meccanismo diverso, senza i limiti fissi del 25-50-25.
Non contrattualizzati. Il ministro Maroni si è lamentato con Brunetta, e i sindacati di polizia hanno emesso un comunicato per protestare contro il decreto. Anche loro (come Cgil, Cisl, Uil e Confsal) contestano le norme che riducono pesantemente il potere di intervento dei sindacati. E' del tutto probabile che alla fine verranno accontentati: dal testo finale del decreto potrebbe essere tagliata tutta la parte che riguarda il personale non contrattualizzato, that is just the police, the military, the prefects, diplomats. They will be saved, all other civil servants do not.
Health and school (and possibly the Presidency). Another controversial issue is that concerning the consolidation of contracts. The initial draft of the decree speaks of only two large contracts, one for the central government and another for the devolved administrations. It 's easy to imagine the reaction, for example, of schools, who suddenly found themselves without a contract of his own. Or health care, with nurses and doctors had to go in the same ranks of municipal employees. In fact the real target of Brunetta is a bit 'less ambitious: it seems that points ad arrivare a quattro contratti, cioè Stato, Scuola, Enti locali e Sanità. C'è però un'incognita: la Presidenza del Consiglio. E' un comparto piccolissimo, che in teoria non avrebbe alcuna ragione di sopravvivere, ma che ha (per evidenti motivi) molte possibilità di farsi sentire nelle stanze che contano. Nel testo del decreto potrebbe spuntare qualche frasetta per salvare il contratto della Presidenza, anche se Brunetta di suo sarebbe contrario.
Stipendi dei dirigenti . Secondo il decreto, d'ora in poi nella busta paga del dirigente la quota legata al risultato dovrà valere almeno il 30% dello stipendio totale. Le amministrazioni non sono d'accordo, anche quelle più vicine al governo. Ieri Forum Pa the Director of Personnel of the Lombardy Region Micele Camisasca pointed out that, as the text is written now, this would reduce the base salary of managers. In fact it remains the obligation to leave unchanged the cost to bring the benefits of 30% should result in lowering the compensation for the position (that the manager receives regardless, and that is proportionate to the importance of his job). When asked once again responded positively Leonello Tronti: we agree, this will be changed. The ceiling of 30% will remain, but will become mandatory until the end of 2016. So there will be plenty of time to adjust, moving the increases in the next years showed that the allowance of the other entries. And then we can not exclude to breach the rule of invariance of expenditure. We bet that this reform will be an opportunity to increase the salaries of executives?
0 comments:
Post a Comment