Some thoughts on the assembly of 30 November on FALCONARA DISPUTE.
First, the positive notes:
1) high participation of citizens in spite of the limited means of information Parlamentino;
2) demonstration of involvement citizens FALCONARA DISPUTE;
3) volontà di continuare la Petizione Popolare e di arrivare, comunque, ad un incontro con il Presidente Spacca prima che il Consiglio regionale si riunisca per il bilancio.
Alcune note.
1) Non è vero che dall’assemblea di venerdì 30 è scaturita la volontà di un patto trasversale tra i consiglieri regionali per salvare Falconara. Se patto ci sarà esso individuerà nel bilancio regionale del 2008 risorse per tamponare qualche falla del disastrato bilancio comunale. E questo, appunto, non significa salvare Falconara! Infatti la VERTENZA FALCONARA chiede ben altro ed è per questo che si è dimostrata una rivendicazione politicamente scomodissima per i partiti proprio perché non chiede to buffer the financial deficit in their own way. Or at least, not only in their own way! The continuing "to throw the ball" on the side of the undeniable political and administrative responsibilities of the budget hole reduces the deep disaffection among citizens only money question of the municipal budget. This means the exchange effect for the cause.
2) But with the petition, which, as the Committee propose to continue to the next meeting of Parlamentino, we insist that any action buffer, year by year, to rescue something of the municipal budget (such as the Visentini repeatedly reminded the Councillor Amagliani) absolutely will not solve the problem of budget Falconara and the sword of Damocles over the sale of public goods and cementing the area sooner or later will fall on the lives of Falconaresi when added to the additional sacrifices that will still be charged to citizens (in the words of locks have been very clear)!
3) What people are asking the Falconara DISPUTE FALCONARA not meant to be understood both by those who govern as to who is the opposition. It's simple: do not undergo a process of desertification, economic, social, cultural and civic life all'imbarbarimento not attend, Falconara must have the tools to design and build a future of TOTAL RENOVATION! So only with the recognition economic (compensation) of the service role that has been assigned - in any manner whatsoever that the Special Law or Special Provision or other - Falconara and Falconaresi can do it!
4) The government and opposition parties do not want to understand that the Marche Region has marked this city for some destinations and industrial infrastructure in the medium and long term. To save the one to which no one has given a destiny (thankfully) and to think about these assets without the blackmail of the debt, Falconara and compensated Falconaresi need to see everything that has been assigned a fate! Such property or common areas still without luck for a destiny delusional are the beach, the Saracini former barracks, the area of \u200b\u200bthe former Liquigas and, of course, schools and public buildings that house community centers and cultural centers ... not to forget the former Montedison!
5) The printing on the outside of the regional advisers intervened (Lucchetti, and Amagliani Binci) and Hon. Greaves are confirming a particular stands out: the DISPUTE FALCONARA scares the parties themselves, those who govern and those who hope to govern and it is a fear that cross from right to left. No matter if someone chooses to immediately disqualify the project of the citizens masquerading behind a "confrontation" or if someone else buckles "colored labels" an instrument of debate as the Parlamentino for fear that their voters are compared with those who do not vote!
6) When the citizens, through participatory democracy, local social interests coalesce related quality of life compressed and degraded by economic choices, territorial, environmental, infrastructure, when the citizens of Parlamentino those choices are no longer accepted as being well-being and In fact, harbingers of further social disasters, they are perceived as "dangerous" by those who govern and those who attempt to govern in place of the former. Yet those citizens, we all Parlamentino, we are anything but dangerous ... perhaps foolhardy as that annoy constituencies economically powerful that almost every party and certainly includes all sides and is inside (and in the choices that counts much, much more of the citizens, "normal").
Loris Calcina (neighborhood committee Villanova)
0 comments:
Post a Comment